Why Should Businesses Choose Automated UAT Testing Tools?

As the last line of resistance before a release, user acceptance testing (UAT) is not something you can take lightly. Does that mean you should consider automation in UAT testing?

Most teams rely on manual testing rather than automated UAT testing tools, which seems to be a general trend. What most organizations fail to realize is that code-based solutions are the reason why UAT seems like a headache to most people. In order to understand this further, we will understand what user acceptance testing is and how automation is the way forward for companies.

Key Highlights of User Acceptance Testing

Instead of going into technical definitions, let’s take a look at a couple of essential things that you need to know about user acceptance testing.

  • User acceptance testing is used for verifying the user-facing functionality of any application or software in the real world.
  • Every user acceptance test describes functionality in the application requirements.
  • UAT aims to provide comprehensive coverage of the product. It is one of the reasons that makes automating UAT tests difficult.
  • UAT takes on a system testing approach, which is the final step of testing right before the software is rolled out.
  • Acceptance tests should be run only after all major defects are identified and fixed during system and unit testing.

When you keep these points in mind, you’ll understand why teams find it extremely difficult to automate UAT tests using hand-written code.

UAT Testing Isn’t for Techies

Through UAT testing, you’re not testing whether the features are working but if the product works for the end consumers.

Because of this reason, several teams think it is best for requirements writers and product owners to specify UAT. Having these people manage UAT makes more send because they can take the unique point of view of the end-users into consideration. However, most requirements managers and product owners have little to no technical skills, which makes it difficult for them to create hand codedUAT suites.

Is Manual Testing the Right Way to Perform UAT?

When you do it manually, it would require at least 2-3 testers to perform the task in about a week. When projects grow, the time needed for running these tests will increase. Eventually, companies may end up skipping certain parts of UAT tests or abandoning them entirely to meet the growing pressure of fast delivery.

Because of this reason, automated UAT tests offer a much better solution. Because it is possible to automate around 99 percent of cases, you can see how it has a clear advantage over hand-coded tests.

Choose the Right UAT Testing Tool for Your Business

Switching from hand-coded tests to automated UAT tests can work for you when you have the right tool. Because of this reason, Opkey presents the best no-code test automation tool that offers 100% test coverage without trading off on quality or scope. From test discovery to reporting and analysis, UAT testing is made easy for organizations with Opkey’sUAT automation tool.

Thanks For Visiting this website any doubts you can comment below, if you want to latest updates on this type of useful information just follow Google News.